We’re happy to welcome many new subscribers to this blog. You join us at a time when most of the articles have been published, and the flow has slowed up a little as much of what we wished to say we have now published. Our attention has turned to the production of our book, which is in the final stages of completion.
We’re enhancing the blog layout to make your navigation experience more seamless. We’ve introduced buttons on the front page, and while only some articles are on their individual pages, we’re working on it. More buttons will be added soon, so stay tuned for these improvements.
In the meantime, below the buttons, there’s a complete list of categories containing articles, ninety-nine in total so far (including this).
What We Are
It’s probably easier to explain what we are not. This is not a fan site – it never has been – and we do not populate our articles with pictures of bloodied crime scenes and victims. If you enjoy that sort of thing, perhaps this isn’t the place for you.
We try not take a stance of ‘innocence’ or ‘guilt’ in the Night Stalker case, although our focus is on highlighting the presence of reasonable doubt in many of the charges.
This blog was set up to demonstrate the inconsistencies and inaccuracies in this most famous of trials.
Using legal documents, we aim to show:
- Unqualified, incompetent defence
- False and misleading evidence
- Failure to investigate mental competency
- Failure to challenge evidence
- Denial of venue change
- Denial of motion to sever charges
- Media influence
- Non-sequestered jury
- Unreliable eyewitness testimonies
- Failure to defend charges
- Hiding of possible exculpatory evidence
- Perjury
- Tainted and compromised lineup
These points remain our central themes.
The right to a fair and unbiased trial and competent assistance of counsel “is one of the safeguards of the Sixth Amendment deemed necessary to ensure fundamental human rights of life and liberty”
Echo Chamber
Amidst the rhetoric and usual tropes attributed to Richard Ramirez and Night Stalker case, we are committed to being a voice of balance. We are here to speak out when blatant untruths are continually given as ‘gospel’. Please read what we’ve got to say, read it twice, maybe three times, and ask us if you wish us to clarify anything; we will do our best to answer. Although we don’t pretend to have all the answers.
The Future
A while ago, I mentioned that we had been invited to talk on a podcast, an interview, if you like. That is still going ahead. We wanted to concentrate on the book first. Once that’s done, I will set up a date and will let you know when and where to find us.
We also intend to eventually include other cases that fall into the “miscarriage of justice” files, both old ones and perhaps current ones. For us, it is vitally important to highlight a broken judicial system.
Thank You
We want to take a moment to express our deep appreciation for each and every one of you. We value the time you take to engage with us, and your contributions mean a lot. Thanks a million for sticking with us and reading our words. You are an integral part of our community, and we’re grateful for your support.


A polite note: We welcome intelligent, enquiring, and polite comments. We do not tolerate trolls or bullying of other members on this site.

Leave a reply to Sara Jordan Cancel reply