The Bald Untruth

By Venning

After Ramirez was identified as the prime suspect in the Night Stalker crimes, several police agencies were keen to ‘clear the books’ by looking through open cases and attempting to find links. Because Ramirez conveniently had no modus operandi, they could blame anything on him: stabbing, throat slashing, bludgeoning, shooting, and kidnapping; it did not matter. As established on this blog, police morphed suspects who were originally described as very different to Ramirez into the Night Stalker.

Most of this can be blamed on the LASD and LAPD’s character creation. However, San Fransisco police would join in the metamorphosis game – open cases in that city that vaguely matched the multiple M.O.s of the Night Stalker would be linked to Richard Ramirez. There were 153 homicides in San Francisco between January 1984 and December 1985 – many unsolved – and police were keen to close them by any means possible.*

One example is the Caldwell sisters who were victims of frenzied knife attacks on 20th February 1985. Former SFPD Inspector, Frank Falzon, claims Ramirez confessed to the Caldwell murders – although he was never formally charged for the crime, which might suggest the San Francisco District Attorney did not agree… or perhaps Falzon is making it up – like Detective Carrillo, a lot of Falzon’s claims are not supported by evidence. It is strange how so many detectives forgot to record Ramirez’s supposed confessions or there is a weak excuse for why they did not – in this instance, Ramirez allegedly shouted the confession as Falzon was walking away.

Many news articles, then and now, link Richard Ramirez to the murder of celebrated chef Masataka Kobayashi in November 1984. However, Falzon believed the suspect was a paedophile neighbour, who was obsessed with Kobayashi’s teenage son. Kobayashi sent his son away to boarding school to protect him and shortly after, he was found dead just inside his front door, and the neighbour was questioned. He was never charged despite remaining Falzon’s prime suspect. Falzon does not believe it was Ramirez, due to it not matching his M.O. – but what M.O.? He allegedly had so many.

Another San Francisco crime – that is forever connected with Ramirez – was the murder of Edward Francis Wildgans on 2nd June 1985. Wildgans was sleeping when he was shot in the head by a small calibre weapon. His girlfriend, Kathy Moore fought off her assailant as he attempted to sexually assault her. This seems to match other Los Angeles Night Stalker attacks, such as Doi, Khovananth and Abowath – and even the untried case of Carns in Orange County.

At the time of Ramirez’s arrest, he was linked to Edward Wildgans, though again, never formally charged – but newspapers stated that Kathy Moore’s description of the killer matched Richard Ramirez.

From the Los Angeles Herald Examiner:

“In San Francisco, police said yesterday that investigators are looking closely at three additional homicides to see if they are linked to the Night Stalker case.
Detectives are examining the June 2 shooting death of 29-year-old Edward Wildgans … Wildgans’ girlfriend, who was not injured in the attack, provided a description of the killer that matched that of Ramirez, [Lieutenant] Kowalski said.”

Los Angeles Herald Examiner, 5th September 1985.

The San Francisco Chronicle told the same story.

“A girlfriend, who was unharmed, gave a description of the attacker that matched Ramirez’s general description [Inspector Mike] Mullane told the San Francisco Chronicle.”

The Times Advocate (local paper for Escondido, California), 4th September 1985,

Kathy Moore was invited to the 5th September 1985, line-up in Los Angeles. Below, an article from the San Francisco Chronicle: Inspector Mike Mullane would not say whether Moore chose Ramirez, only that he was pleased with the result.

We now know from habeas corpus document 20.3, that she did chose Ramirez. Here is Kathy Moore’s witness card.

At the preliminary hearing in 1986, video evidence came to light that showed a sheriff’s deputy using hand signal to encourage witnesses to pick Ramirez at the live line-up. This happened at both line-ups. Watch the silhouetted man who emerges from the right hand side.

However, before the Night Stalker hysteria had reached San Francisco – even before the hype had taken hold in Los Angeles – the Wildgans suspect was described as someone very different.

Ramirez has shapeshifted many times over the course of the Night Stalker case, managing to be Mexican, Chinese and white at various times, while his height ranged from 5’6” to 6’4” and his hair ranged from blonde to black – as well as various lengths and styles. But this is a new one: thinning hair.

The San Francisco Examiner, 3rd June 1985.
Magnified
A second, less detailed report, The San Francisco Examiner, 5th June 1985.

A shortish balding murderer turned into tall Richard Ramirez with thick curly hair. It is sad – and also appalling – that a victim could either lie – or be so vulnerable that the police can manipulate them into identifying an innocent man and years later, forensics specialists were still desperately clutching at reasons to implicate him by searching for DNA.

San Francisco Examiner 13th December 2009

* the cold case database mentioned in this article is from 2005 – some of the crimes have since been solved. Ramirez is still not listed as the suspect for the Caldwell crime or Wildgans and had yet to be implicated in the Leung case. He is only listed for the Pan Incident.

As you can see, Ramirez did not have thinning hair.

First written on 5th August 2023

16 responses to “The Bald Untruth”

  1. You make good points here, V, are they lying? Are they manipulated, swayed by the two deputies holding up two fingers at the line-up? Are they so desperate to get a conviction, any conviction, that they are prepared to perjure themselves and swear a short man with a balding head, was in reality, a 6ft 1 Hispanic with a full head of hair. Are they just confused, traumatised, and eager to fall in with what the police say? Not one single witness seems to have a clue who they were looking at.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I’m appalled that nothing happened when those public defenders reported what happened in the line-up. They just ended up discredited. That said, they should have made more of a fuss at the time.

      Liked by 1 person

  2. Richard Ramirez just didn’t have good enough defense lawyers to have spotted all these false allegations pined on him they were either to lazy or didn’t give a care to fight for his defense I just don’t get why any of the evidence weren’t brought into his trials. Why they had blamed him for all the murders that weren’t even him that did them.

    Like

    1. What’s crazy is that this information has been out in the open for a long time and yet nobody has done anything about it. Even the Philip Carlo book pointed out that the blood and semen that was not from Ramirez or the victims was found at multiple scenes, yet people see that book as a Bible of his guilt because of the section about the killings. That book came out in the mid 90s before his appeals were read! Plus there was another book by Dave McGowan who mentioned it (he clearly had access to the case legal documents) beyond that, few are willing to shine light on these inconsistencies.
      There was actually supposed to be an inquiry into his poor defence in the early 90s but nothing ever came of it.
      He was never tried for Wildgans because he wasn’t ever charged with it.

      Liked by 1 person

  3. i’ve just read in “People v. Ramirez” that these cases were related, because: “Defendant sold to Filip Solano property stolen during crimes included in each of these groups”. May I ask, do you have a specific article that examines this theme of stolen property and who was it sold to?

    Like

    1. There are three posts related to Felipe Solano and his associates in the “It’s Relevant” section. Solano was impeached for lying about who else sold him goods. We also talk about it in the article in the crime section concerning the Doi incident.

      Like

      1. Ok, thank you. I’ll read those today. Anyway, such a pity that there nothing about it in the document I’m reading now.

        Like

      2. You only have the 2006 petition, by the sound of it. You need the 2008 Ramirez V Robert Ayers one, we linked it in comments under the Kyle article. It has nearly 1000 pages, including supporting documents. Get to document 14, that’s the main body and is nearly 800 pages. You can also access the supporting documents by clicking on the attachments. It’s a long process, we’ve been researching this for a long time now.

        Like

    2. When I’m back from my holiday, I will update the Solano posts. There is more than meets the eye with that whole aspect. We will never get to the bottom of it, but we can raise questions.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Yes, as with this case as a whole. Questioning is all that’s left.

        Like

  4. Thank for for this precious information. Indeed it’s going to be a long process, but I’m determined to go through this investigation. I looked at the document I have again, yes, you were right-its says 08/07/2006.
    Yesterday I read the 3 articles about Solano, it’s so sad to say, that while what you wrote there is completely logical, what happened in the court is completely ridiculous. like, Solano said he received stolen goods only form Ramirez (Ha!). I can’t believe anybody in their solid mind can believe that! I remembered comments under a video where there show all the stuff stolen from attacked houses: one says-Oh, he was such agifted thief to stole so much (cause it’s really too much); others answers: yes, he also stole so many hearts…Situation is laughable and sad at the same time. Hearts is ok, but all these good are not ok. Especially when you read testemonies of his “fellow burglars” describing Richard’s burglaring M. O.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Exactly, he sounded like an incompetent burglar during the day, yet we’re supposed to believe he becomes an amazing and prolific thief by night.

      I do need to update my Solano posts at some point.

      Like

  5. I’m reading everything you’ll read, just hope i’ll get the notifications.
    I hope more people will learn about this work you are doing. As much as I know, it’s only about a year you post here. Maybe not this year, not a year after, but people need to know about this. All, who have critical thinking, who can ask questions and can see more, than a surface will appreciate it.

    Like, I’ve left with questions l, doubts, when I found you, saw that you had the same questions, tried to find answers to them, I could see that it was not just me, something was really wrong. I don’t know what a conspiracy is going on, why majority would not ask the same questions, but I hope one day it will change.

    Liked by 1 person

  6. This blog was launched in June 2022, after months of research. We’re still researching, still writing.

    Like

    1. And keep up this work, because it’s very important what you do. You have to be very brave to raise the questions raised here first, to loudspaek about it. More people need to know about what happened. I hope the day will come majority will learn about all this, although I don’t believe much: majority is almost always incorrect .

      Liked by 1 person

  7. If they truly had a tape they would have used that in court and media so I doubt they had a tape. Also if richard did shout something he was probably under stress or pressure and with his brain damage etc…. Anything he says makes no sense and should at all be considered a confession but ones again Gil and his crew of puppets twisted RR words as always. People consider Gil a hero cuz I mean cops never “lie” haha give ma a break. It’s like Gil was playing a crime movie in his mind to the point he became to deluded by it cuz he’s so obsessed and that’s how he got the theory of Gil! Sk anything he played in his head be related it and linked it to Richard. Gil’s so pathetic. Poor Richard

    that shape shifter business is also a very annoying thing to me! He didn’t look at all like any of the morphed descriptions. So much omg went wrong.

    also don’t even get me started on how they what manually checked his prints for what 3 minutes cuz they were in a “Hurry”. Those cops need especially Gil need to wear those Avia shoes and just stop talking and spreading lies!

    Like

Leave a comment