Tag: compromised
-
A Bit More Ballistics Bollocks
“Robinson was the last of three law enforcement firearms examiners to evaluate the general rifling characteristics of the ballistics evidence. Yet the two other examiners, who did not reach entirely the same conclusions, were not called to testify at trial. For example, in the report prepared by Robert Christansen on March 28, 1985, he concluded…
-
“I’d Make Him My Man”
Sometimes victims of horrific crimes are beguiled, induced or traumatised into deliberately making wrongful identifications. This may be attributed to PTSD, manipulation, confabulation or rage. Here is one story where this nearly happened, if it hadn’t have been for a cooler head. The Man on the Mountain Los Angeles Times Magazine, page 11, 1st May…
-
And Justice for All
*images may need desktop viewing for clarity* “After a recess, in another hearing held in the court’s chambers which was held outside of the presence of Petitioner, the court and the parties discussed courtroom security. Trial counsel was concerned that there had been no screening of the members of the public which were coming to…
-
Ballistics Bollocks?
“In one response to a basic question about what the defendant does during the trial, Mr. Ramirez’s irrationality leaks through: “Sit and watch the whole facade – the stupidness of it. You have lay persons giving legal jargon that they don’t go to school for even and pretend to do scientific stuff.” When I asked to whom he…
-
Sensation-Seeking Parasites!
“The media, the television, authors, newspapers; they tragically fail in their most important duty to report the truth in an unbiased and truthful manner. It’s easier to convict a man with words than with evidence“. Richard Ramirez – from an interview with Mike Watkiss The media frenzy surrounding the capture of Richard had guaranteed a…
-
The Fragmented Mind -The Watson Report
* Some images may require a desktop for greater clarity* “I’ll describe some characteristics of a man I knew almost ten years ago. When I first met him he was sitting a table. He was thin and somewhat hunched over; he looked like a bird with a broken wing, afraid and isolated. He had a…
-
Damaged – The Henderson Letter – 1987
*Images may be better viewed on a desktop* The One in which a Neurologist Determined he had Brain Damage, and Everyone Looked Away. “Denial of due process of Law in a capital trial violates the Fifth, Sixth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.“ The details surrounding the cognitive deficiencies suffered by Richard…
-
Who Defends the Undefended? Part Two: Conflict of Interest.
*Images may require viewing via desktop for clarity* In Part One, which can be found HERE, I examined how unqualified the defence counsel was, how ill-prepared and unorganised they were and how they virtually abandoned Ramirez to his fate. Welcome to Part Two, where we will continue to examine the failings and shortcomings of Daniel…
-
Serial Delusions
“A series of crimes involves distinctive features, offences or signature mark to indicate that particular individual likely committed all of the crimes. Distinctive features of a modus operandi include cause of death, type of weapon used, or victim. By definition, a series of crimes requires similarity among the criminal acts; crimes linked together because of…
-
Anatomy of a Manhunt.
This trial is a joke.. So said an infuriated and frustrated Richard Ramirez during the ridiculous charade that passed for a trial and it’s not hard to see why. This went to print July 30th, 1989. As the jury began it’s deliberation, casting was underway for a TV film called “Trackdown: The Anatomy of a…
Expendable For A Cause. 