Forty Years

On August 31st, 1985, the hunt for the Night Stalker ended, and the circus began.
The following is an excerpt from our book “The Appeal of the Night Stalker”. See the link at the end of this post for details.

The Capture

Richard Ramirez, travelling to Arizona and back, missed the release of his mugshot on the evening news.  Unbeknownst to him, police and the Special Investigation Section officers were staking out the Greyhound bus depot and were willing to kill him on sight. As if California were the Wild West (which some might argue that it still is), Ramirez was wanted dead or alive, but preferably dead; the SIS team is unofficially known as the ‘Death Squad’. Carrillo admitted that part of him wanted Ramirez to be killed. 

The Greyhound Bus terminal, from a 1970s image.

Ramirez, coming through the inbound entrance instead of ‘escaping’ through departures as expected – left the station and headed to a liquor store to buy snacks. There he saw his own face – not a lame composite- on the front of a newspaper naming him as the prime suspect, and he ran.  He jumped onto another local bus, but again his appearance drew attention from the passengers.  He felt he had no choice but to leave the bus and continue on foot, probably heading for his eldest brother Julian’s house.

Frightened and not thinking rationally, Ramirez ran across a freeway, jumped a tall soundproofing wall, vaulted over fences and traversed down alleys into the Hispanic-populated barrios of Boyle Heights, East Los Angeles.  While the Night Stalker had hitherto been a nebulous shapeshifter, once the nation was shown Richard Ramirez’s face, he was instantly recognisable in a way he never was to his alleged victims. 

Multiple people saw him.  A man watched him jump off the Santa Ana Freeway’s barrier wall and land on the hood of a car, before running down an alley.  On East 7th Street. A resident saw Ramirez “lurking” and telling his Doberman to be quiet because he was “tired”.  Ramirez then jumped the fence.  He was seen emerging from an alley on Siskiyou Street looking nervously all around him.  On South Indiana Street, he attempted to carjack a woman but was chased away, climbed up a six-foot high wall and dropped into nearby Percy Street, where again, he was recognised immediately by a woman in her garden.  He was pursued by her son, who was brandishing pruning shears.  At another house, Ramirez knocked on a door and, holding his throat, begged a woman for a drink of water.  Recognising him, the resident reacted by screaming and calling the police.

Rosalio Dimas pictured here with his garden shears. The image ran in the newspaper on September 1st, 1985 and September 21st, 1989. Credit: Leo Jarzcomb, Herald Examiner Collection.

By now, police helicopters were circling above.  Finally, turning onto East Hubbard Street, Ramirez attempted to steal a car and, when this failed, he attempted to carjack another woman.  This ignited rage in neighbours who gave chase, with one vigilante ‘hero’ striking Ramirez over the head with a metal bar.  Amid the commotion, the residents did not realise they were beating up the most wanted man in the USA, until somebody shouted, “Es el matón!” (it is the killer).  The police were called, and another 25-year-old Ramirez arrived on the scene in the form of Deputy Sheriff Andres Ramirez.  He was informed by resident Manuel De La Torre that Ramirez had attempted to steal his car and assault his wife. 

It was not until the deputy asked for his name (Ramirez told him his given name, Ricardo Ramirez) that the ‘penny dropped’.  Deputy Ramirez began to worry as residents converged on the patrol car, yelling in Spanish that they should “get him”.

Ramirez was placed under arrest for attempted carjacking, grand theft auto and assault.  He was unarmed, compliant and non-aggressive.  The most evil man to walk the streets of Los Angeles was apparently not carrying a weapon, although it was later claimed he drew a knife when attempting to carjack and that he threw his gun away.  This resulted in police searching the streets and suggesting one of the Hubbard Street residents had taken it for themselves.  No gun was seen or recovered, much like the other weapons Ramirez was accused of using.  If Ramirez had a gun or knife that morning – and was the Night Stalker – surely he would not have hesitated to use them when running for his life. 

In fact, when interviewed on tape by Philip Carlo, Ramirez said:

“I turned at all the people around me and I spit at them (sic) I poked my tongue out at them.  I stuck it in and out, you know, like a serpent… If I would’ve had a pistol, I would’ve made them scatter.  They wouldn’t be as brave as they thought they were.”

It is conspicuous that he said if he had a gun, he would have merely pointed it at them instead of firing.  Instead, the ‘terrifying, Satanic Night Stalker’ poked his tongue out at them like a child.

Los Angeles Mayor, Tom Bradley, declared no trial was necessary and handed out awards. He had an election to win. Credit: Chris Gulker, Los Angeles Herald Examiner Collection.

Ramirez was exhausted and dazed, and bleeding heavily from being assaulted,  so an ambulance was called.  He was alleged to have said in Spanish, “thank God you came,” when the police arrived.  After his capture, Mayor Tom Bradley stated that there was no need for an “arbitrary legal process” because he was already “satisfied” that they had “found the right man” before the veracity of the evidence was tested.  It was clear that a trial was not an ideal outcome.  Alas for law enforcement, Ramirez was handed over very much alive, his head wounds treated and completely covered in gauze bandages.  That is, until they were removed so that Carrillo,  Salerno and others could be seen escorting Richard back to Hollenbeck Station with blood visible down the back of his neck and over the collar of his shirt. 

Sgt Frank Salerno and his famous ‘perp walk’. (Carrillo, marching ahead, was cropped out of the shot). Credit: Mike Sergieff, Los Angeles Herald Examiner Collection.

On 3rd September, two award ceremonies honoured the citizens instrumental in taking the infamous Night Stalker off the streets – all before he had been identified, arraigned or even charged.  Deputy Ramirez also received an award, yet he was merely doing his job – responding to a carjacking.

The “Hubbard Street Heroes”, including Deputy Andres Ramirez, receive their awards. Credit: Mike Sergieff, Los Angeles Examiner Collection.

And the wheels of ‘justice’ began to turn.


Fast Forward

Over the years, the narratives surrounding this case have evolved and intensified. Carrillo, who was not originally the lead detective and was seldom referenced in contemporary newspapers, has since emerged as the prominent figure of the Night Stalker Task Force, surpassing even Salerno in public recognition.

Current media, including documentaries and podcasts, frequently revisit this case, yet still fail to address essential questions. Four decades on, many uncertainties persist. Our approach was to look beyond sensationalism and superficial treatments, committing ourselves to in-depth analysis. The investigation began with a review of approximately 1,000 pages of court documents and culminated with direct access to the original case files in a basement in Los Angeles. Research is ongoing, and we believe that the full truth of this case remains elusive.

There have been accusations that our work asserts Richard’s innocence; however, a thorough reading will demonstrate that such claims are not made. Instead, we maintain that the case did not undergo rigorous testing and that proceedings were notably biased toward the prosecution. We present evidence indicating that the judicial process was perfunctory, a box-ticking exercise, making any alternative verdict highly improbable in the context of the Night Stalker case.

Venning consolidated our collective findings into a comprehensive volume that avoids sensationalism, refrains from fabricating victim dialogue, and does not speculate about the perpetrator’s thoughts or invent scenarios that did not happen. Our work provides readers with the resources necessary for a critical examination of the case, free from hysteria, leaving any interpretation firmly in their hands.

Coming Up…

Although there has been a period without updates, the team has remained actively engaged. As previously stated, we are committed to sharing any significant developments as they arise. Recently, following extensive communications with the relevant authorities, we have obtained additional information. This process is gradual, as documents are being received incrementally and require thorough review. At present, most of these materials consist of motions filed during the pre-trial phase – and never seen in public before – which correspond with our ongoing investigations. We have also requested further documentation and will continue to compile and share pertinent findings as they become available.  There may be some disruption to a few posts as we update, or split into two, etc, so please bear with us.

The first volume we were allowed to examine in LA.

During this time, feel free to ask us any questions, and we’ll do our best to answer.  We welcome serious, intelligent input.
We would also like to extend our sincere thanks to those who have read our book and shared valuable feedback; your support is greatly appreciated.

Source: The Appeal of the Night Stalker: The Railroading of Richard Ramirez (click the link to buy your copy)

28 responses to “Forty Years”

  1. wooow more again great work you 3!
    It’s crazy how they all ganged up on him and beat him with a pole, sometimes a hero isn’t truly a hero especially if they are dishonest, and if he did have a gun I would think it would probably would have been empty and would have used it just to scare the people but yes like you said Jay not actually shoot at them.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I think a ‘brandishing’ of a weapon to be more likely, to “scatter”. He didn’t have a gun.
      Yes, more work. More unsound actions from the prosecution and the judge, and on it goes.

      I don’t think their behaviour crazy, as such; violent, yes; they were acting as vigilantes do and they would’ve killed him in the street given chance. One imagines the disappointment that they were prevented from doing so.

      Tom Bradley did a huge amount of damage with his confirming guilt and handing out awards. No fair trial was possible.

      Liked by 4 people

      1. Ya true, but didn’t he have like a pocket knife or something cuz if he did he would have for sure used it to scare them

        Like

      2. A knife was reported but never found either on him or anywhere in the vicinity.

        Liked by 3 people

      3. Ahhh I see, crazy how they just assume he was armed and like Gil stated throw them over the Golden Gate Bridge, I mean aren’t we allowed to question cops cuz sometimes I get scared to and think like omg what if they are right

        Like

      4. Always question.

        Liked by 1 person

      5. Yes you are absolutely right Jay, I’ve never truly questioned anything against a cop not cuz I 100% believed them h ur cuz I was scared, until I came across this case and especially this blog were I began to truly understand and question everything and really stopped being scared to question things,

        Liked by 1 person

      6. Justice is never really about ‘truth’, it’s about who can pay for their version of it to be heard and believed. Especially when strong evidence is severely lacking.
        There’s the accepted story and the outcome, the bit in the middle is forgotten and actively supressed.

        Liked by 3 people

      7. I see I see makes sense I totally understand now! I’ve always been the one to fight for truth and justice but I totally get and agree with what you said!

        Liked by 1 person

      8. I’m glad to see you here again, Sarah.

        Liked by 2 people

      9. Aww thnx Jay! I’m glad to be back! Like I said before, I’m never ever leaving this blog hehe!
        Also have you guys or anyone seen Gil’s movie yet?

        Liked by 1 person

      10. No, and I have no intention of doing so.

        Liked by 2 people

      11. Good for you Jay! I don’t either but temptation will get me at some point 😂

        Like

  2. He was alleged to have said in Spanish, “thank God you came,” when the police arrived..
    YEAH. A confirmed Satanist is going to say ‘thank God’ in ANY language.

    Liked by 4 people

    1. Agreed. Just as he exclaimed, “Jesus!”, in that interview. All Satanists call on Jesus, right? 🤔

      Liked by 3 people

  3. Thank you so much for this journey back thru time and my life personally. I’ll forever have the bonding with him of 8/31/85 & 9/1/85. Always.

    And I acknowledge that your work is unbiased nor prejudiced. It’s the facts as documented without the fallacy of memory or emotion.

    This historic ordeal will soon be reevaluated. It has to be. There is just too much mud in the eyes of society. Thank you for bringing us clear water to wash away the blindness.

    He changed culture.

    He changed me.

    I keep Ricardo Munoz Ramirez alive with me so he will “..be avenged.” But, he will be avenged with Love and logic.

    I have no shame to admit I am In Love w Richard as he is and not what he has done. Richard will forever be ” IS ” to me instead of “was” as mortality demands it.

    My 18 year old self watching LIVE on TV his capture would be grateful to know I will someday be proud to call him “friend” because I listened to him instead of the media.

    Thank you so much for giving Richard back his voice.

    Liked by 5 people

    1. I imagine seeing the footage after he was brought down would stay with you for a lifetime.

      Somewhere, there had to be balance. A place not driven my popular media and documentaries created to mislead and to give out misleading and often false or incorrect information. It had to be done and sometimes, what’s important is looking for what’s not there; not what is.

      Thank you for your support, as always.

      Liked by 3 people

    2. Hi l Wuchter I love that comment of yours !! I feel similiar. Lets revenge him with love and logic ! Oh yes.

      Liked by 2 people

    3. He looked so dazed and scared in that patrol car with all the bandages. People laugh at what a coward he seemed. If only they knew how the case was built on such unstable foundations. It’s difficult to watch someone who has just had their freedom taken away for life, and knowing no victims truly described him as the suspect.

      Liked by 5 people

      1. People are wretched. Imagine how awful that day was for him. When I see him with his head all bandaged up like that, it really pisses me off. It just shows what common thugs those so called heroes were that beat him over the head. They should have been arrested and put in jail for assault.

        Like

      2. Right. No one described him. No forensics matched. A case built on a mountain of lies.

        Like

  4. he also called his mom to pray for him! Again what devil lover satanist would say that?!

    Liked by 2 people

  5. Hey guys , so good you re all back . When I read the article and the comments I had tears in my eyes again. I ve not stopped doing research about Richards case either , and only this afternoon I ve read some great stuff about joining ( joinders ) of serial murder , especially the personality of the different types of offenders and the behaviour of the offenders at the crime scenes and the crime scene itself. In 1985/89 there was such a lack of investigation in comparison to now , thats what I noticed while reading and then again I was sure about all the mistakes at the investigations in Richards case ! And when I thought about the capture after reading your article I felt just bad . It still annoys me so that they even said no trial was needed for him ! Crazy people !! And by giving the rewards so early ..this made a correct trial totally impossible. How could they do so ? I wish we can find out someday . Thanks for your article , its so well written again.

    Liked by 4 people

    1. Hi Isabella, we don’t go away, not really, we just don’t post until we have something to say.
      I don’t see the point in re-posting old articles, although it does mess up the algorithm for us.

      We are gearing up to post new stuff we’ve got, but it takes time to go over things, cross reference, check, and re-check.
      We are still waiting for them to send everything we requested; red tape, box ticking, and lots of reading to do.
      There’s no ‘magic bullet’ , but each small piece adds to the picture and helps to bring more awareness (I hope) and understanding.
      Good to see you.

      Liked by 2 people

  6. Ultimate red pill case. I couldn’t stop reading this blog when I realized all the authors here were pulling from actual evidence. I don’t trust anything out there anymore. That’s a smart thing you bring up about him saying he’d make them scatter. He didn’t say something like, “If I had a pistol they’d all be regretting it.” Can’t wait for the other evidence to be revealed, it is a process to get to the truth and real justice!

    Liked by 6 people

    1. “Red pill case.” That’s so true!
      Yes, the word “scatter” is an important distinction, I think.
      Join the club; we don’t trust anything out there, either; not now.

      Liked by 2 people

    2. That’s the first thing my partner noticed about his capture. He said “If he was this brutal killer, he’d have a gun and fantasise about killing with it rather than just waving it around to intimidate.”

      Liked by 3 people

      1. Yep. This is one of the first things I wrote in the very first post. It sits strangely, given the brutality of what was happening.

        Liked by 3 people

Leave a reply to VenningB Cancel reply