Predictable

Sex, Satan and Another Cash Grab

Well, that was all rather predictable and disappointing – it was only to be expected. However, as the latest Ramirez documentary, Richard Ramirez – The Night Stalker Tapes, dropped, that familiar feeling of déjà vu crept in. This post will only deal with one small part of it.

Once again, the omnipresent retired Detective-Turned-Actor, Gil Carrillo, was there, with the usual script.  Carrillo loves to talk about Maria Hernandez; his focus is always heavily centred on her and the murder of Dayle Okazaki because from there, his serial killer theory was born.
Below is a clip from the latest Peacock TV documentary; in it, Carrillo is talking about Maria Hernandez and how she described her killer.  Unfortunately, what he is saying isn’t the truth.

Clipped from the Peacock TV documentary, Richard Ramirez – The Night Stalker Tapes.

“Tell me what he looked like”.
“High cheekbones, narrow jaw, hair was dishevelled. Stained, gapped teeth,” says Carrillo with a flourish.

Maria Hernandez did not describe her attacker and Okazaki’s killer like that.  What Maria actually said is well documented, and Carrillo must know that.  To bolster this blatant untruth, the documentary then flashed up the police artist sketch created by Somkid Khovanath in July 1985, not the one created by Maria in March of that year.

At this point, one must assume that it was a deliberate move to mislead unless the producers of this documentary couldn’t be bothered to search out the Hernandez composite, although it is not hard to find.

He continues:
“As the case went on, there were several artists’ renditions.”   Here, he is correct. See this post for the composite sketches and photofit gallery.  

Somkid Khovananth was the first Night Stalker victim to talk about bad teeth. Previously, only Carol Kyle had made dental observations, although Kyle said the teeth that she saw were “straight and white.”


What Did Maria Hernandez Say?

Below is taken from the witness statement of Maria Hernandez and can be found in document 20-3 of the 2008 Habeas Petition:

“Upon turning around she instantly observed a light-skinned male, either Mexican or Caucasian, 5’9″ to 6’1”, thin build, dark hair, wearing a black “Members Only” type jacket, white shirt, and black trousers”. (Document 20-3)

And this is the police sketch she helped to create, complete with a moustache. 

The sketch Hernandez helped to create on the 18th March 1985, taken from the 2021 Netflix documentary, Night Stalker: The Hunt for a Serial Killer.

And her lineup card, where she mentions the facial hair.

Although indistinct, it reads, ““He had a little beard and moustache when the crime [illegible] but I do feel it was 2.”

Maria Hernandez never seemed sure of her attacker’s appearance, and she struggled through the in-court identification she gave, admitting that she could not identify him from memory, That’s hardly surprising; four years had elapsed by the time of the trial itself, and she indicated at the preliminary hearing in 1986 that she had only viewed the man who attacked her and murdered her roommate for a mere two seconds.

A court motion we recently unearthed from Volume One of the Ramirez case files.

Detective Carrillo insists that every Night Stalker victim mentioned decaying teeth; he mentions it every time he’s interviewed, which seems to be all the time.  This is how misinformation passes into folklore and is seen repeated in every discussion about Richard Ramirez.  

Subliminally inserting the Khovananth sketch into a dialogue concerning Maria Hernandez only distracts and confuses. It would be more beneficial to quote what she reported in her witness statement followed by the correct sketch. 
Not doing so insults anyone with enough intelligence to search for the facts themselves.

For information on the Murder of Mei Leung, please see THIS POST.

If you would like to learn more about the whole case then why not treat yourself to our book or read through the many articles on this site.

Note: We do not make posts about the current family allegations, we knew of them (as did everyone else) three years ago. Our point of interest has always been the handling of the trial, the investigations and the appeals.

13 responses to “Predictable”

  1. Predictably disappointing and biased. The extra soundbits of him are delectable, bt the context is always distasteful.

    Thank you for your post.

    Liked by 5 people

  2. It’s disappointing that they didn’t use psychiatrists who actually worked with him for extended periods. I realise that those doctors (if not retired) are busy actually working to help death row prisoners instead of flapping their lips on TV, but a psychiatrist could have delivered an analysis of the real documents.

    The man and woman on this shower of shit knew nothing about him.

    Liked by 6 people

    1. You are 100 % right. They talk political correct only for money. It is a shame for RR and the Victims.
      Psychiatrist should know better.

      Liked by 5 people

      1. One of them, the man, has recently done a YouTube podcast, again spreading misinformation. It never ends!

        Liked by 2 people

  3. again this documentary is a shame like everytime same liars.

    Liked by 6 people

    1. Always. It makes me roll my eyes.

      Liked by 3 people

  4. There’s plenty more milage to be squeezed out of this yet.
    There’s Hubbard Street for starters, not to mention that Maxxxine thing that used Richard for clout as well. The man is dead, it’s really a free for all.
    No one is fact checking, they don’t need to.

    Liked by 3 people

  5. Some of you may be interested in this, where Rosie is interviewed by her pastor.

    It’s incredibly odd.

    Liked by 3 people

    1. What I find weird is that she voluntarily wrote to her supposed molestor? Like why would you write to the man who molested you for years? And in the peacock documentary she said that she told Mercedes about the abuse but that Mercedes didn’t believe her and told her that “you said that Richie molested you?” “I don’t believe you” and that even her own father didn’t believe her which I find really weird and even didn’t really believe her when he saw the letter of him apologizing to her. It seems that Richard and Julian Jr. were the ones who had the worst drug addiction and I do believe that Julian Jr. felt guilty about what happened to his brother. Also, does anyone know the exact number of nieces/nephews he had cause sometimes I get confused.

      Like

      1. They did, yeah. They would take the children into Mexico for alternative medicine. I do think they have that heritage. A great proportion of Mexicans have come up with high Native DNA after testing. I think his family followed a mix of that and Catholicism. It was in one of the documents.

        Liked by 1 person

  6. did they release the movie yet the one with Gil?

    Like

    1. I don’t think so.

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a reply to sarah1997 Cancel reply