The Rodriguez Break-in

The Netflix documentary, Night Stalker: the Hunt for a Serial Killer is full of errors which, to be fair, makes it no different to any other Richard Ramirez documentary. They’re all full of lies about what the victims described. But what qualifies the Netflix series for The Most Misleading Award is its use of CGI mock-ups of murder scenes.

When a room is shown from above and the camera zooms upwards, it’s not real. This isn’t limited to rooms. Some images of Max and Lela Kneiding’s bodies aren’t real either. Comparison pictures won’t be posted here out of respect to the Kneidings but if you watch it, look at the feet: totally computer generated. Plastic-y. These were interspersed with real photos of the deceased. Some of the bloody shoeprints from Whitney Bennett’s blanket are fake crime scene images too. The real ones are also shown which makes things extra confusing unless you’re already knowledgeable about the case.

So, it’s difficult to know what’s real and what’s not, including shoeprints purported to come from an attempted break-in at the home of a Sheriff’s Deputy. His name was John Rodriguez and he and his wife, Lorraine, were interviewed on episode 2. They explained how Lorraine awoke and her voice scared the killer off as he busted open a window that had been painted shut. Despite it only being a routine failed burglary, Sheriff’s Homicide, led by Detective Carrillo (of course!) showed up and much drama ensued.

The Avia print at Deputy Rodriguez’s house

At first, one could be forgiven for thinking this is just another misleading mock-up. If it really is genuine, it has not come from the same type of shoe involved in the Night Stalker crimes. That, according to trial documents, was an Avia Aerobics model 445B. Not the black Aerobics 440 that was zoomed in on in this same documentary. Either way, the print shown above is neither: 445 and 440 shared the same sole design.

The above photo shows the impressions of one circle and three concentric rings, leading to six parallel lines. The ‘Night Stalker Avias‘ have a circle and four concentric rings with eight parallel lines. See below:

The cast and print from the same Zazzara impression

If that Netflix photo is really from the Rodriguez break-in, and it’s not the correct shoe, then these people have spent decades believing they were nearly killed that night in mid-June 1985 when it was probably just a burglar. They lived in Pico Rivera: there were more than 700 burglaries there in 1985. Statistically, it was bound to happen to them sometime.

“Night Stalker Avias” vs the Rodriguez print

It probably was still made by an Avia. It looks like Aerobics model 460, patented in 1983.

Avia 460

Can you see that the lines and indents sort of match up? It’s still inconclusive but it’s more like a 460 than the 445 (pictured below).

Avia 445 – one of many shoes with this design.

If that’s from the crime scene, then it’s another lie in the Night Stalker case.

The 440 and 445 have the same patent number on the sole because they follow the same cantilever design. In fact, a 460 is shown at close range on the documentary.

In Episode 3, they show a cast of a shoeprint (below). It looks like a different print to the Rodriguez photograph but again, you can clearly see features of the Avia 460.

So again, we are left with more falsehoods. It’s exhausting.

BUY OUR BOOK HERE!

-VenningB-

3/4/2023

27 responses to “The Rodriguez Break-in”

  1. Sounds like people were falling into some kind of panic-mode; a bit like in the days of the Satanic Panic where people saw bogeymen everywhere.

    Liked by 2 people

    1. This was during the “Satanic Panic ” , around the same time as the McMartin stuff, double panic everywhere.

      Like

      1. I lived in a place that was so convinced it was real they had guards on a maternity ward in the year when a supposed human sacrifice was meant to take place.

        Like

      2. In Canada?!

        Like

    2. The other day I was telling my friends how AC/DC was perceived as satanic and they found it hilarious

      Liked by 2 people

      1. This makes me laugh so much. Such hysterical nonsense.

        Liked by 1 person

      2. “but they’re so mild.” Yeah…but 80s America…

        Liked by 1 person

      3. A quick scroll through social media shows it never went away.
        Satan was trending in the US a few days ago.

        Like

  2. Whether they mocked that up for Netflix, or whether it came from the not-quite-a-break-in, what is obvious is that the sole pictured was not a 445. They’re very different. Look at the edges, and that’s before we get to the flex joint. Either way, it’s lazy and misleading, and I imagine, it’s assumed no one will notice.

    The inconsistencies multiply.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. So sick of the lies and b.s.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I hate that the documentary is so misleading that you don’t know if that photo is genuine. But it looks like another busted myth. How many more?

      Liked by 1 person

  4. Some patterns are triangles and some are zigzags. Idk myself what’s real or not these shoes are really pushing my buttons! These shoes were very common as you guys mentioned they came out in 1982 I believe, so now would they even think of believing it was a rare shoe?

    Like

    1. Yeah lots of Avia shoes have concentric rings. It seems like Carrillo spread hysteria himself without getting a forensic specialist in to check lol. Now these people have been scared for nothing. It’s definitely an Avia 460!

      Liked by 3 people

      1. They really hyped up all this avias shoes and satanic shit like really messed up super dark and spreading false hope on the public for nothing!

        Like

      2. Definitely a 460, he doesn’t know what he’s talking about.

        Like

  5. peepr69a316eb57 Avatar
    peepr69a316eb57

    I think you have discovered a legal scandal…….!!!

    Liked by 2 people

    1. I keep thinking of the deputy and his wife who have spent decades thinking they were almost killed by the Night Stalker when it wasn’t even the same print 😮
      They’ve probably got some trauma from it.

      Liked by 2 people

    2. They flashed up those prints very quickly on the Netflix documentary, I assume they thought no one would notice. How wrong they were..
      I wonder if Carrillo realises they are a totally different model of Avia.

      Like

  6. these avias are really giving me nightmares I can’t then put on my own sneakers without thinking of they are avias or not spoilers it’s not avias. Also where on earth is Richard even gonna get a pair of sneakers like that how many sneakers does gil think he has?! Richard was a jewel thief not a sneaker thief i don’t even think Richard cared about what type of shoes he’s even wearing tbh

    Like

    1. Gil thinks these are the same sneakers. He just saw the circles and declared them the killer’s shoes without properly looking.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. That’s not right at all he should carefully had someone professionally look at those shoes to just say it’s all the same without proper investigation is so suspicious to me! Gil thinks he’s the best detective ever what else can he do or is cable of doing next I don’t want to know

        Like

      2. To be fair to Carrillo (I am on rare occasions), I can understand he saw the circles and freaked out. I would if I was a detective. But considering he was so fixated on these shoe prints, why did he not properly look at them? Maybe he is also prone to hysteria lol

        Like

      3. lol I do understand that as well. But still he should Have done what a true detective would have done and properly check everything a young man’s life is at risk and the take advantage of him a man who’s clearly sick is just cruel just for your benifits like if you knew there other suspects why give them impunity when you know damn well he most probably isn’t the NS!?!

        Like

      4. Yeah, so I just assumed these shoes were the “murder Avias” too. It was only when I was obsessing over them for the book that I noticed they didn’t look right. I didn’t even tell the other two writers until I was sure. Carrillo just went all-in and scared the shit out of the occupants.

        I just watched another documentary with the Rodriguezes and they showed the shoeprint for the Zazzara case in its place. These documentaries never fact check and lie to the public. I can’t trust them ever again.

        Liked by 1 person

      5. I don’t understand why Gil would thag frighten the public like that all for what!! To bring fear and hysteria and be rewarded with money not caring at all that a young man’s life is at risk his health should have been known not hidden! Which me me super mad! Then they come up with excuses as to why he behave like this and that ughh. Honestly I don’t ever trust documentaries when it’s about people they in it for money you can’t just do that!m that’s so cruel! Nobody should trust them! But people pretty much worship those videos and the words from Gil’s mouth! I’d rather have a “15 years old” do a documentary about me than Gil or those people 😂

        Like

      6. The whole police force was scaring the shit out of everyone! Have you seen the news article about the boy who was out joyriding? Someone thought he looked like the Night Stalker and called the police. Next thing, there were police helicopters flying low over houses, shining the beam down, officers yelling “LOCK YOUR DOORS! GET INSIDE!” on megaphones, police dogs running through backyards… it was just a kid in his mum’s car!

        Liked by 2 people

      7. Omg seriously?! That’s actually crazy sounds like a scene from a movie! They made this night stalker seem like this super villain! No i haven’t seen it!

        Like

Leave a comment