Night Stalker: Why the Khovananth Incident Was a Pivotal Moment

By Venning

On 20th July 1985, Chainarong Khovananth was murdered by a gunshot at close range. His wife, Somkid, was raped and robbed. The Khovananth case became the most important Night Stalker case of all because it incorporated various aspects of previous attacks, seemingly tying them all together (the use of a small calibre pistol, male occupant shot at close range, alleged child assault and robbery). Moreover, the perpetrator’s appearance matched the vague description police agencies had been pursuing – a tall, thin Latino male with dark curly hair and dental problems, including a gap between his top front teeth. The teeth aspect was not yet revealed to the public.

Back in June, Richard Ramirez was pulled over by traffic police for running a stop sign, and before he escaped, had drawn a pentagram on the car. The most recent ‘Valley Intruder/Night Stalker’ incident at that time was Bell/Lang, at which pentagrams were found, and Ramirez inadvertently became a person of interest. The car turned out to be stolen and was impounded. Inside the vehicle, a dental appointment card was discovered, made out for Ramirez’s alias, ‘Richard Mena’, which led police to his dentist, who confirmed his physical attributes. This appearance was noted. Attempts to apprehend ‘Mena’ at his next appointment failed due to police incompetence.

What Did the Night Stalker Look Like?

Judging by police statements that come with the Habeas Corpus (in Document 20-3), up to this point, victims and witnesses had given a variety of descriptions of their attacker. Maria Hernandez had seen a 5’10”-6’1” light-skinned man with facial hair. Witnesses to Tsai-Lian Yu’s murder believed the suspect was between 5’6”-5’8” and East Asian. Lillian Doi claimed her husband’s killer was white with mid-brown hair and was between 5’10”-6’0”. Launie Dempster had seen a dark-skinned Mexican lurking in cars. Carol Kyle saw a shiny-haired 5’10”-6’0” Latino with a side-swept wavy fringe and nice teeth, Sophie Dickman had seen a 5’8” white man with brown curls. The child abduction victims saw a blonde man of medium build. Therefore, it is factually incorrect that everybody described ‘Richard Mena’.

If we were not in possession of these police statements – and the court testimonies via the Habeas Corpus – these descriptions would have been buried forever. But back in the summer of 1985, this was the pivotal moment in the Night Stalker case. At this juncture, all the other witness descriptions were thrown down the memory hole. The man who raped Somkid Khovananth – immortalised in a police sketch – had a vague resemblance to ‘Richard Mena,’ and thereby became the benchmark by which all suspects would be compared. Two later victims would describe their own different Night Stalkers, but their unreleased composite sketches would never supersede the ‘Khovananth Composite.’

The infamous police sketch by Fernando Ponce

WANTED

On 28th August 1985, the LAPD Chief of Police, Daryl Gates, released the ‘wanted poster’ below, stating that the Khovananth attacker was responsible for all the attacks. This included later attacks in which a blondish man was described.

At the time of the Khovananth Incident, no other attacks like it had taken place. It was similar to the Doi Incident insofar as the husband had been shot in bed, but different in that Lillian Doi was not dragged around the house and repeatedly raped (newspaper sources state that she was, but ultimately, the rape charge was dropped, no semen evidence was admitted at trial, and the Petition only mentions her facial beatings and restraints). The only reason the Khovananth case was added to the Night Stalker tally was because Avia shoeprints (that police had discovered at other crime scenes) were discovered on the front porch and back step of the house.

It seems like confirmation bias: the detectives had decided that Richard ‘Mena’ was the prime suspect, and it only took one survivor, Somkid Khovananth, to describe a man with curls and bad teeth, for them to decide he was definitely the Night Stalker. This was also reinforced by the pentagram on the car; the suspicion moved beyond mere bias.

Now their task was to find out his real name. Thousands of people contacted the police to report friends, or suspicious neighbours just because they vaguely resembled the Khovananth composite. It was only a matter of time before friends of Ramirez contacted the police – especially after the mayors of Los Angeles and San Francisco offered financial rewards to would-be informants. Ramirez was a burglar and two sets of criminal associates in different parts of the state reported him to the police. As a result, three different law enforcement agencies, the LAPD, LASD and SFPD simultaneously closed in on him.

In conclusion, there is a strong possibility that the Night Stalker character was engineered to look like Richard ‘Mena’ Ramirez, which caused a snowball effect leading to his capture. Being expendable to the criminal community he mingled with – and unable to defend himself due to brain damage – Richard Ramirez became the perfect prime suspect.

Further reading:

I wrote a book on the whole case in chronological order!

Ramirez’s 2008 appeal petition.

Information on Ramirez’s brain injuries.

A video explaining the Avia shoes.

Debunking the myth that the Night Stalker exclusively wore black.

Informants in the Ramirez case – collection.

Below: a video about the “Man in Black Myth”.

First posted 29th July 2023. Updated on 27th May 2025.

43 responses to “Night Stalker: Why the Khovananth Incident Was a Pivotal Moment”

  1. First of all the sketch does not look nothing like Richard. Evidence didn’t match Richard as the suspect their is a different name Mena.

    Like

    1. It’s absolutely hideous. All the features are wrong and his distinguishing features are absent.

      Richard Mena in the car was definitely Ramirez but I don’t see how they thought the composite looked anything like him.

      Like

    2. Yes, I found this to be a bit of a reach as well. The sketch does resemble him: high cheekbones, gaunt face, large dark eyes, bad teeth, curly black hair. It’s missing the arched eyebrows and the lips are a little thinner than his but the overall facial structure is quite close.

      Liked by 1 person

  2. I saw someone ask what the Night Stalker looked like on Reddit. They posted the police statements. People are so dumb that it didn’t register what she/he was asking: the police statements don’t resemble the ‘dishevelled, stinky, bad teeth, dark-haired’ person in the popular narrative. Some people are in denial even if the evidence is spelled out in front of them. Someone said this is not a mistaken identity case but it totally is. I’m sad for humanity if they don’t have critical skills for this.

    Liked by 2 people

    1. The level of debate on Reddit is probably why no one ever tries to challenge us on here. They can’t.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Tiktok is as bad. No critical thinking at all.

        Like

    2. Most people are incredibly obtuse and fail to see what point was being made. It’s not so much about faulty eyewitness identification. It’s about a certain detective/detectives on the task force claiming everyone saw a messy, tooth decayed lanky person when the police statements say otherwise. Victims changing their descriptions reeks of coercion.

      Liked by 3 people

    3. I think I saw that thread. The common response was a mind-blowing “That’s what Google’s for”. They didn’t seem to understand the point being made at all.

      Liked by 1 person

  3. u kidding me another RR show?! Yes he’s way too obsessed it’s ridiculous! I’ve had enough of the lies I’m seriously so done! Even after his death he never gets rest or any piece. Someone should put a stop to GIL. And NO! Your work isn’t futile at all! Just cuz he has more influence doesn’t mean your work is nothing! You guys out your heart and soul into this work! Never give up even if it gets few people to believe us that’s still good! We got your backs! Yes don’t give up! His lies will catch up to them all of them just you wait and see! You guys have done too much to just throw it all away! Your work is the TRUTH. you’re raising awareness for RR and many others in his situation! He’s never had a voice we are his voice especially you guys! You risked a lot by doing this don’t out it away because you think it’s pointless cuz it’s not at all pointless! You will be rewarded in your life by doing this blog!

    Liked by 1 person

    1. There’s several. In addition to the one he mentioned, there’s a film where he has a cameo role and hits Richard (it’s out in September, I think) and then a two-part NBC News documentary coming. We were approached for that, but when I replied, the producer ghosted and unfollowed me. Carrillo’s just done the filming for it.

      Like

      1. Wait… A cameo role where he hits Richard?? What???

        Like

      2. Yep! He’s mentioned it on his latest repetitive podcast guest slot!

        Like

  4. interesting-case-indeed Avatar
    interesting-case-indeed

    Im new to RR’s case. Although I was aware of him when he was alive in prison I was never invested in his story. Not even when the Netflix documentary came out I wasn’t looking into it. I don’t know what sparked my curiosity now but I randomly came across a video of him with his name mentioned and then continued watching. What I find very suspicious about this whole trial is that it has never been broadcasted in it’s entirety. I would have bought the explanation that footage copyright had not been sold, bought or whatever at that time to whichever news agency but it’s been 40 years and they are still not released despite the huge media coverage. My mind can’t rest until I find out more, what was said in the courtroom ect, errors that were made and covered up or made to look intentionally bad that RR couldn’t object or defend against because of his mental impairment. Im glad Im not the only one asking questions and not taking the detectives words as ultimate truth. Im also glad to see that the comments in this comment section are very recent and up to date keeping the discussion alive in this modern time. Something about this case just feels off. And I can see why it would be easy to blame and convict RR because he clearly was troubled and clearly did morally bad actions. But did he do ALL those crimes? Was he at ALL those scenes? Like I said… when one raises their hand and says hmm.. I don’t think he did everything he was accused of, people automatically categorize you as one of his “groupies”. Im just trying to make my own discernment of a case that appears very fragmented and sensationalized.

    Liked by 2 people

    1. Welcome to our blog! RE: the broadcast, that’s what we wonder about. We know that one of his psychiatrists, George Woods, watched 2hrs of court footage, so where is it? Whenever a new clip surfaces, it’s silent. It’s weird that you can’t get the transcripts anywhere either – even his appeal lawyers were unable to obtain some from early hearings because they’d been destroyed.

      I hate the groupie argument. It’s one of those ‘thought-terminating cliches’ designed to silence debate and treat the curious as silly deluded women – assuming they are all women. It’s a rebuttal for the simple. There are so many holes in the case and so much time has elapsed that we’ll never get to the bottom of it, but we think it’s important to present the defence he deserved. I’d hate for all his appeal lawyers’ work to go to waste just because he died.

      Liked by 2 people

      1. yes I agree and your all doing an excellent job for his defence RR deserves to be heard and cuz of you guys now he can! I just pray that people read your work and ch and change their perspectives on this whole case! Also why is he the only case that not a single video of him (other than the ones released) have been out to the public? Why was his defence team denied access to those? Why was it destroyed? What are those cops hiding from us? Are they hidden cuz they think those videos make RR Innocent when they want him to be guilty?! That’s what I think! They just hate the thought of him being innocent and all their work as cops down the drain so they lie editing videos of him to make him look bad and twist his words.

        Liked by 1 person

    2. Hello, you are very welcome here. It is the most convoluted case and I hope you read the articles that we’ve written and find some of what you are seeking in them.
      The discussion is very much alive, although it’s not easy to raise your head and ask questions. Ask in the wrong place and you get jumped on and your comment removed, and possibly a ban as well.
      It is a sad fact that a lot of people find Supreme Court documents more offensive than the crimes themselves.

      Like

    3. karinac110a861b195d4 Avatar
      karinac110a861b195d4

      I agree! The court case, even interviews, every darn piece of footage has parts muted or edited out altogether. I also, cannot rest until I find more. They are definitely hiding something. I’ve been wondering for 4yrs why there is so little video footage of him online, it’s like Google has swept everything clean except for false information and lies by weasels like Phillip Carlo and Gil Carrillo.

      Liked by 2 people

      1. We think a lot has been erased or edited. Did you see the longer version of the interview they used on Inside Edition? That showed how much editing had gone on to show his character as they wanted it. There is very little footage of him, yet more lies are spun around him than any other case.
        Carrillo churns out new podcast appearances nearly every week, where he spouts the same nonsense. He is never questioned or pulled up on any of it. He obviously must know what he’s doing as he can’t be unaware of victim statements.

        The US government refused to let the forensic specialists, retained by his Habeas lawyers, a deeper look at the fingerprint or shoeprint evidence. Why? If there’s nothing to hide?
        Lisa DiMeo’s findings in the shoeprint evidence is eye-opening, and none of the fingerprints were independently verified. So much has been covered up over the years. Most don’t even bother to question it; thank you for looking deeper.

        Liked by 1 person

      2. karinac110a861b195d4 Avatar
        karinac110a861b195d4

        @~ Jay ~ – Yes the Inside Edition interview was a total joke. Everytime I see Gil Carrillo I want to put it on mute. He needs to be held accountable. I’m trying to spread the word on youtube about this stack of overwhelming evidence and how this case is just a crazy violation of RR’s constitutional rights.

        This case reminds me of the Steven Avery case in a way. The limited mental capacity – the corrupt officers etc.

        Liked by 1 person

      3. Gils ongoing lies are revolting!

        Liked by 1 person

      4. karinac110a37110 Avatar
        karinac110a37110

        Gil needs to be stopped!!! I’m so disturbed by all this.

        Much love from Australia x

        Liked by 1 person

      5. Yes, it’s very disturbing.

        Liked by 1 person

      6. Yes, the Avery case is awful, as are Ivan Cantu’s and Carlo DeLuna’s; the list goes on.
        The lack of understanding about Richard’s case is astounding. He was assumed guilty right from the start and a fair trial was impossible. The case was never properly tested because of the catastrophic failures of the defence, prosecutorial misconduct, and the constant interference from the media.
        We were the first to rip this case apart and build it back up. Our intention has always been to show the failures of the justice system (not to cry innocence) and this case highlights every single one of them. It has not been well received in some quarters, as you can imagine, and most people on YouTube or Reddit don’t like the errors of the case being shown. Many of them still believe he kept Maxine Zazzara’s eyes on the mantelpiece in his apartment. An apartment he never had. It is that ridiculous, and demonstrates how wild rumour and gossip ruin intelligent conversation.
        Thank you for reading what we have to say, and for questioning everything.

        Liked by 2 people

  5. interesting-case-indeed Avatar
    interesting-case-indeed

    Thanks everyone. I concur with everything mentioned in the replies. Frankly also, “2 hours of trial footage” seen by the psychiatrist is absolutely nothing. That’s not even enough hours to make a mental eval assessment. This trial dragged on for how long… 3 or 4 years? That’s an equivalent of minimum of hundreds of court hours. One day in court can take up to 7 hours. Sometimes less. Sometimes more. Where are the transcrips, what has been done to the footage, why are some clips muted and some with sound ect. Im also new to this blog so I haven’t read all sections of it but I read that the creators of this site are working on publishing a book. I hope the book will be finished and published with factual information which is very much needed for people like us who like to investigate. Not these other, outdated, rubbish books that provide nothing but magazine clip outs or some random copy letters made by RR. I long to read an investigative book with finally some substance. And although he is no longer alive I still think it’s important to publish whatever speaks against these claims because RR wasn’t the first one and wont be the last one who’s a troubled young man with low capacity being framed by a desperate police force looking to solve a difficult case. We see it happen time and time again (remember the central park 5?). And it’s very easy to do so if they were in fact degenerate and “bad”. But still, evidence is evidence. Or lack there of. Things are so different now in terms of technology and social media. Back in the 80-90s people had to believe the mainstream media because that was their only source outlet. Now that we have the internet, we can look at videos, share and compare documents ect. We have the possibility now to discern in a completely new way. But not enough people seem interested. I hope that will change.

    Liked by 3 people

    1. Yes, 4 years of hearings and the trial took up most of the year. And that’s all they could give him. Weird. Suspicious, even.
      The book should be out soon. We’re doing the finishing touches and edits. I’ve tried to keep it as factual as possible, asking questions where we don’t have answers. We’ve tried to keep any emotive and sensationalist language out of it too. It is disappointing that some people look at our home page and deride it, assuming it’s a hysterical ‘he was innocent’ conspiracy theorist site when we are merely presenting the defence. I’ve written it in a way that rolls from the very beginning as it unfolded, mostly chronologically, except for a few cases. We’ve worked hard on it so I hope people will give us a chance. I’m sure many people will criticise it but at least it’s different.

      I’m not familiar with the Central Park 5. What happened?

      Liked by 1 person

  6. interesting-case-indeed Avatar
    interesting-case-indeed

    Have you also wondered why no interrogation tapes were released? Surely they must’ve interrogated him for hours and hours. And all we have are tapes of him confessing stuff to that author Philip Carlo? What about police interrogation audio? I look forward to your new book. Will it be digital form or a paperbook? Will it be available somewhere to purchase or are you publishing it for free? The Central Park 5 case back in the 80’s was about 5 boys or in their late teens early 20’s who happened to be at the wrong place at the wrong time. They were beaten during interrogation, coerced to give false confessions, demonized by the media, convicted to long sentences in prison and later exonerated because the true r*pist DNA was linked to the case and theirs never was. There’s been both documentaries made about them and also a Netflix drama series called “When They See Us”.

    Liked by 2 people

    1. Oh yes, we have wondered frequently about those tapes. Venning wrote an article about the confessions, you might find it of interest.

      False Confessions?

      Liked by 1 person

    2. Yeah that’s another mystery. We know that the judges in early hearings heard it. I think it was Nelson who through out his supposed ‘third person confessions’. I believe Carrillo and Salerno engaged in misconduct during those, with coercion, intimidation and refusing him a lawyer, so that could be why they don’t want it leak.
      The only Carlo audio I’ve heard is from the interview that’s written in the back of his book, so it’s another rumour of confession and no proof yet again. It’s infuriating.
      I’ll attempt to do both paperback and ebook. It’s quite long, so the paperback will be large.

      I will look for the series, it sounds interesting. There are so many of these cases, yet people think us stating that Ramirez might also have been a victim of a miscarriage of justice is unthinkable to them.

      Liked by 1 person

  7. interesting-case-indeed Avatar
    interesting-case-indeed

    I can’t wait to purchase your book. I was actually about to purchase the Carlo-book yesterday just to have something tangible in my hands to read. But after many reviews I decided not to. Good thing I didn’t because I came here and I would rather invest it on yours. Indeed, it shows how easily impressionable people are and how hellbent some are to hold on to their convictions just because popculture and media wants them to do so. I always ask myself “Cui bono?” Who’s benefitting from these narcissistic docus, where for example Gil Carillo sits and sheds tears over his accomplishments? Cui bono? Im pretty sure all the exposure Gil has made for himself and continues to make, will further drive away any suspicion of wrong doing on his part and his colleagues part. Diverting attention from the other side of the narrative. Regarding someone who’s not even alive today and can’t defend himself.

    Liked by 2 people

    1. “Cui bono?” is one of my favourite phrases with regards to this case.
      I do have the Carlo book, and although the crimes part is fictionalised, in many respects, the trial section is really useful and interesting. Carlo actually laid out some doubts in the book about the trial, but many seem to have either missed it or ignored it.

      Liked by 2 people

    2. my other question is how low can Gil go? To what level can he reach if he hasn’t already reached it? How many more can he possibly to this to? Is he ever gonna stop lying? I have so many questions yet I don’t think anyone can answer them!

      Liked by 1 person

  8. Yes, there are many who are negative towards us, but we knew that was likely, and that’s their problem. To be angry about legal documents, especially when you’re supposed to be interested in “true crime” is just so counter productive. It’s not a discussion if you just ban people who want to talk about the court papers it’s ridiculous, but there it is. We don’t bother, but we see others get banned all the time just for saying that the 2008 petition exists.

    Liked by 1 person

  9. same with me I almost my self got Carlos book after learning about the case but once I cane across you guys and this blog I too rather invest my time and money on your book!

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I resisted buying it for so long, but I’m glad I did in the end because it confirmed some of my suspicions and theories about the policing part of the case.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Also how many book has there of RR, it is only Carlos?

        Like

      2. I should think there’s many. A bad one, that I’ve seen on Google books, is by Clifford Linedecker. Richard hated it haha he said it was all made up from newspaper articles – and it is. It’s higly sensationalised and gratutious and graphic when it talks of the rape victims.

        Like

  10. and yet people believe that book as well with Carlos too I’m sure! They take these books as gospels without even doing proper research. Are you guys gonna watch that 2 part series coming?

    Like

    1. I suspect we will watch it, our curiosity will get the better of us, although it will be the same old stuff over and over.

      Like

      1. I’m just curious as to why they making another series about him if there are already so many and they are as you said all the same? What’s the point then?

        Like

      2. Next year it will be 40 years since the Night Stalker crime spree and the arrest of Richard, so I imagine it will be a re run of all the usual nonsense.

        Like

      3. interesting-case-indeed Avatar
        interesting-case-indeed

        If your book conveniently came out on the 40th anniversary of when RR was arrested, that’d be epic conversation starter – even for people who are unaware of or indifferent about the case.

        Liked by 2 people

      4. It will be out much sooner than that, but it would certainly be a way of marking the date.

        Like

  11. Amazon if all goes well, although I will try to upload it onto Draft2Digital which has expanded distribution.

    Like

Leave a reply to Laurie S Cancel reply